Peer review and indie publishing?

Anyone familiar with the science publications will understand what I mean by peer review; the combined process of editing, reviewing and managing content.

What relevance does this have to indie publishing? If you do not have a publishing company working for you then it is up to you to edit and format your work for publication.  We often require a second, third, … pair of eyes to check our work for small spelling mistakes, formatting errors, or grammatical slip-ups.  Short of hiring an editor to do this, it is often easiser and more efficient to share the workload.  In fact, this is ultimately the process used by Wikipedia; a familiar resource for most internet users.

For example you write a book and decide to self-publish, but do not have a qualified editor on hand.  What do you do? 

Say another writer is in the same predicament.  Do you exchange books and agree to proofread/edit each others?  Or do you choose to publish without this step, potentially damaging your author platform?

Let me stress, this is not a new idea; several writing groups already exchange work and I’m sure there’ll be other indie authors out there exchanging ideas.

Of course the disadvantage of peer review is that it relies on mutual trust and honesty.  If you do not know ‘said writer’ personally they could choose to plagarise your work, or only put in minimal effort at editing it.  There is also the question of recruiting peers and the potentially long timescales involved.  It is an evolving process.  Once you know someone is a trustworthy ‘peer’ you will be more likely to collaborate with them, but where do you start?

If you’re interested I’ve given a compact flowchart of the peer review process below.  It’s not complete, so for those interested in more detail click here.  There’s also a great leaflet about the process available from sense about science.

Some remaining questions:

Would you as an author be interested in a similar process?

Or, if you’re a reader, would this make you more likely to invest in an unknown author?

Of course sometimes if the manuscript isn’t fit for publication it will be rejected by the journal editor before peer review.

See also – Promoting indies – what would you like to see?

About indie e-books is aimed at providing a common platform for indie writers and publishers to show-case their work. The content is kept limited to one (free) short story per author to give the reader an idea of the writing style and talent involved and to help forward them on to more substantial work.
This entry was posted in Indie Publishing and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Peer review and indie publishing?

  1. timctaylor says:

    Great post. It’s not just science; in the software world code review by developers working on the same team is commonplace. But, as you say, the trick is to all be on the same team, and the trust in your peer’s effort and competence is hard won, and vice versa. As I’ve learned, everyone is potentially blind to their own mistakes.

    • Thanks. 🙂

      As an example… I constantly confuse independant and independent and even though I’m aware of it the mistakes still slip through. :/

      • timctaylor says:

        Yes, me too. When I used to train software teams in quality, we used to get them to write a constantly updated ‘code review checklist’ of the top 10 things that the team got wrong, just like your example. The trick was to take things off the list once you stopped getting them wrong.

  2. Pingback: What does ‘indie’ mean to you? | Indie Ebooks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s